肿瘤营养规范化治疗合理性评价标准的建立及应用 点击下载
| 论文标题： | 肿瘤营养规范化治疗合理性评价标准的建立及应用 |
| 英文标题： | |
| 中文摘要： | 目的：建立肿瘤营养规范化治疗合理性评价标准，为肿瘤患者的营养规范化治疗提供参考。方法：以国内外肿瘤营养相关治疗指南或专家共识为依据，在征求专家意见基础上，制定我院（亳州市人民医院）肿瘤营养规范化治疗合理性评价标准。应用加权优劣解距离法（TOPSIS）对我院2019年1－6月50份营养治疗病历（A组）进行评价，根据评价结果进行营养干预，并对干预后的2019年8－12月的50份营养治疗病历（B组）进行同法再评价。结果：建立的我院肿瘤营养规范化治疗合理性评价标准包括营养不良诊断、营养不良的性质描述、营养筛查与评估等18项指标。经分析，A组病历营养治疗合理率仅为18％（9份病历与理想解的相对接近程度≥0.6），B组病历其营养治疗合理率为78％（39份病历与理想解的相对接近程度≥0.6）。营养干预前后营养治疗合理性（病历与理想解的相对接近程度≥0.6）差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：制定的肿瘤营养规范化治疗合理性评价方法切实可行，评价结果直观、合理；营养干预有助于降低营养治疗的不合理率。 |
| 英文摘要： | OBJECTIVE：To establish the eva luation criteria for the rationality of tumor nutritional standardized treatment ，and to provide reference for nutritional standardized treatment in tumer patients . METHODS ：Based on domestic and foreign guidelines or expert consensus ，the rationality evaluation standard of tumor nutritional standardized treatmentwas formulated in our hospital （Bozhou Municipal People ’s Hospital ）. 50 nutritional treatment medical records in our hospital from Jan. to Jun. 2019 were evaluated by weighted TOPSIS ；according to the evaluation results ，nutritional intervention was carried out ，and 50 nutritional treatment medical records （group B ）from Aug. to Dec. 2019 were re-evaluated by the same method after intervention. RESULTS ： The established evaluation criteria for the rationality of tumor nutritional standardized treatment in our hospital included 18 indicators，such as malnutrition diagnosis ，description of the nature of malnutrition ，nutrition screening and evaluation ，etc. After analysis ，the rational rate of nutritional treatment was only 18％ in group A （Ci of ideal solution with 9 medical records≥0.6），and 78％ in group B （Ci of ideal solution with59 medical records ≥0.6）. There was statistical significance in the rationality of nutritional treatment before and after nutritional intervention （Ci≥0.6）（P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS ：The established rational evaluation method of tumor nutritional standardized treatment is feasible ，and the evaluation results are intuitive and reasonable. Nutrition intervention is helpful to reduce the irrational rate of nutritional treatment. |
| 期刊： | 2021年第32卷第06期 |
| 作者： | 梁海，沈娟，邓郡，李晓霞，嵇云鹏，张金莲，李芸，程刚，曾诚 |
| 英文作者： | LIANG Hai， SHEN Juan，DENG Jun，LI Xiaoxia，JI Yunpeng，ZHANG Jinlian，LI Yun，CHENG Gang，ZENG Cheng |
| 关键字： | 加权优劣解距离法；肿瘤；营养规范化治疗；评价标准；合理应用 |
| KEYWORDS： | Weighted TOPSIS method ；Tumor；Nutritional standardized treatment ；Evaluation criteria ；Rational clinical use |
| 总下载数： | 81次 |
| 本日下载数： | 2次 |
| 本月下载数： | 81次 |
| 文件大小： | 619.60Kb |
* 注：未经本站明确许可，任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作！